The Public Procurement and Contract Administration Act No. 11 of 2012 is on course to be repealed and replaced. Chief Procurement Officer within the Central Procurement Unit in the Ministry of Finance, Oscar Seaman, confirmed that information in a panel discussion about the status of the country’s Procurement Act on the Government Information Service (GIS) recently. He says this decision follows a review of the Act by Public Procurement Consultant Patrice F. Pratt in 2015. Seaman says the plan is for the new Act to be in effect before the end of 2016. Seaman says this new Act will address the weaknesses and inconsistencies of the current Act. He says it will seek to build capacity for local suppliers. According to a release, Prime Minister,. Roosevelt Skerrit, first disclosed plans to have the Procurement Act repealed and replaced at a Chew On It luncheon hosted by the DAIC in June, 2015. At the time Mr. Skerrit told the meeting in reference to the Consultant “she sent us an emergency memo saying that we should convene an emergency sitting of Parliament to have this Act repealed because there are certain provisions in the Act that could cause injury to the State.”
The Central Procurement Unit has been holding consultations with the public sector on the proposals for the new Act that is expected to replace the 2012 Procurement and Contract Administration Act and intends to hold similar consultations with the private sector shortly.
1 Comment
Citizen
5/25/2016 03:49:37 pm
Sounds like a load of cover up utterances to me. All he is doing is repeating that which has been said by the professionals, the members of the very group challenging the government at this time based on the fact that the PRESENT laws has not been adhered to!! So how is it that they are calling for the PRESENT LAWS to be adhered to as if they see them as adequate and useful when the government representative who is repeating their concerns is claiming that the law must be repealed and reconsidered, draughted and presented for passage in a new form when this was never made clear before? Is it that this will be redone in such a way so as to allow the government the leeway that it wishes it had presently so as to protect itself from litigation when it implements what is clearly unfair and biased policies which benefit its cronies? We better watch this like hawks!!
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Q95 NewsCurrent and past news stories. Archives
March 2025
Categories |